<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>codemonkey.org.uk &#187; execshield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/tag/execshield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codemonkey.org.uk</link>
	<description>Dave Jones' Linux &#38; opensource stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>execshield split-up.</title>
		<link>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/03/11/execshield-splitup/</link>
		<comments>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/03/11/execshield-splitup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davej</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execshield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the longest living patchsets we&#8217;ve carried in the Fedora kernel is that of execshield. Over time, bits of it have gone upstream (in particular, some of the randomisation bits). In F11, it&#8217;s still a 1000 line 30K diff, touching all manner of core kernel functionality. To try and get more of it pushed [...]<p><a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/03/11/execshield-splitup/">execshield split-up.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>



No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the longest living patchsets we&#8217;ve carried in the Fedora kernel is that of execshield.  Over time, bits of it have gone upstream (in particular, some of the randomisation bits). In F11, it&#8217;s still a 1000 line 30K diff, touching all manner of core kernel functionality. To try and get more of it pushed upstream, I&#8217;ve been working on splitting it up into its component parts.</p>
<p>The current state of the diffs is at <a href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/execshield/">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/execshield/</a>.</p>
<p>The emulate-NX-with-segment-limits chunk is unlikely to ever go upstream. A bit of a shame given it&#8217;s the largest part of execshield remaining.  Linus wasn&#8217;t thrilled by it, and it is a pretty nasty hack.<br />
Also, with modern CPUs having hardware-NX, it becomes less useful over time. (Though we still need to carry it judging by the number of old-school 686 users we still have).</p>
<p>So if we do have to keep execshield, we should at least try to make it cleaner and smaller.  Every time I poke at it, I manage to shave off another hundred lines or so.</p>
<p><a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/03/11/execshield-splitup/">execshield split-up.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/03/11/execshield-splitup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

