<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>codemonkey.org.uk &#187; ssd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/tag/ssd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codemonkey.org.uk</link>
	<description>Dave Jones' Linux &#38; opensource stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Four X25-E SSDs in RAID-0</title>
		<link>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/</link>
		<comments>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davej</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X25-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst on the subject of storage, this is just obscene. Four Intel X25-E SSD&#8217;s in RAID 0. Those are the SLC variants too, which are still ridiculously expensive (Currently $447 for a 32GB one). So $2k for an average read speed of ~560MB/s is impressive, though a little out of my (and most peoples) price [...]<p><a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/">Four X25-E SSDs in RAID-0</a> is a post from: <a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>



No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst on the subject of storage, <a href="http://techreport.com/articles.x/16291">this</a> is just obscene.<br />
Four Intel X25-E SSD&#8217;s in RAID 0. Those are the SLC variants too, which are still <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001P4X2AA?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=codemonkeyorg-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B001P4X2AA">ridiculously expensive</a>  (Currently $447 for a 32GB one).</p>
<p>So $2k for an average read speed of ~560MB/s is impressive, though a little out of my (and most peoples) price range.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t got to the bottom of why RAID0 of my two cheap MLC SSDs didn&#8217;t yield any noticable improvements at all.<br />
No matter what I tried, I was bound to the performance of a single disk (~80MB/s).</p>
<p><a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/">Four X25-E SSDs in RAID-0</a> is a post from: <a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gskill SSD performance</title>
		<link>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/16/gskill-ssd-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/16/gskill-ssd-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davej</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gskill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got two 64GB SSDs. In particular the gskill 25S2S&#8216;s. Initial impressions: Yes, faster than a hard disk, but not *that* fast. The blurb claims sequential reads of up to 155MB/sec. Maybe the ICH7 I plugged it into sucks for some reason, but I could only hit about half that. Running them both in [...]<p><a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/16/gskill-ssd-performance/">Gskill SSD performance</a> is a post from: <a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>



No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got two 64GB SSDs. In particular the <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231220">gskill 25S2S</a>&#8216;s.  Initial impressions: Yes, faster than a hard disk, but not *that* fast.</p>
<p>The blurb claims sequential reads of up to 155MB/sec.  Maybe the ICH7 I plugged it into sucks for some reason, but I could only hit about half that.   Running them both in RAID0 didn&#8217;t give me a significant increase either.  I&#8217;ll do some more conclusive experimenting on newer SATA chipsets when I go into the office next week.</p>
<p>One thing that I did find really strange though, was the hdperf results.<br />
<img src="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ssd-hdperf.jpg" alt="gskill SSD performance from hdperf" /></p>
<p>Interesting how the performance isn&#8217;t uniform across the SSD, and also how the patterns shape up as we get into the higher sectors.</p>
<p>With <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26rs%3D%26ref%255F%3Dsr%255Fnr%255Fi%255F0%26keywords%3DSSD%26qid%3D1232144824%26rh%3Di%253Aaps%252Ck%253ASSD%252Ci%253Aelectronics&#038;tag=codemonkeyorg-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957">SSD prices continuing to tumble</a><img src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=codemonkeyorg-20&#038;l=ur2&#038;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, it&#8217;s great that this kind of performance is getting closer to becoming mainstream.  Whilst the results above don&#8217;t blow me away, it&#8217;s still a decent improvement over rotating media.<br />
As a final example: untarring the 2.6.28 kernel to 2x 7200rpm disks in RAID0 = 27 seconds.  The same procedure to my raid0&#8242;d SSDs = 11 seconds.  Not too shabby.</p>
<p><a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/16/gskill-ssd-performance/">Gskill SSD performance</a> is a post from: <a href="http://codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/16/gskill-ssd-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

